CRITICAL READING STRATEGIES EMPLOYED BY GOOD CRITICAL READERS OF GRADUATE STUDENTS IN ELT, STATE UNIVERSITY OF MALANG

  • Praptika Septi Femilia IAIN Jember

Abstract

The objective of the study was to find out how good critical readers employed their critical reading strategies and what model of reading shown by these strategies. Qualitative approach was applied in this study with case study as the research design. This study involved three good critical readers determined by the result of reading comprehension test given. The data were collected through retrospective think aloud and in depth interview. This study reveals that these three good critical readers employed nine critical reading strategies which consist of strategies for constructing the meaning of the text; they were previewing, questioning to understand and remember, monitoring comprehension, solving vocabulary problems and interpreting the text; and strategies for evaluating the arguments presented by the writers which consist of contextualizing, reflecting on challenges to belief and values, evaluating the writers’ arguments and; comparing and contrasting related reading. It was also found that the pattern of how these strategies utilized formed interactive model of reading. It is suggested to further researches to focus more on discussion about critical reading strategies which are related to reasoning evaluation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alderson, C. 2000. Assessing Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aloqaili, A.S. 2012. The Relationship between Reading Comprehension and Critical Thinking: A Theoretical Study. Journal of King Saud University - Languages and Translation, (Online), 24: 35-41, (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210831911000373), retrieved on April 13, 2015.
Brown, H.D. 2004. Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Crawley, S.J. and Mountain, L. 1995. Strategies for Guiding Content Reading (2nd Edition). Florida: A Longwood Profesional Book.
David, D. 1998. Critical Reading Strategies, (Online), (https://www.paec.org/david/reading/general.pdf), retrieved on July 1, 2014.
Fowler, B. 1997. Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to Promote Critical Reading and Thinking. Longview Community College.
Pang, J. 2008. Research on Good and Poor Reader Characteristics: Implications for L2 Reading Research in China. Reading in a Foreign Language, (Online), 20(1): 1-18, (https://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/April2008/pang/pang.pdf), retrieved on July 20, 2014.
Pirozzi, R. 2003. Critical Reading, Critical Thinking Third Edition. Boston: Addison-Wesley Educational Publisher.
Rumelhart, D.E. and McClelland, J.L. 1981. Interactive Processing through Spreading Activation. In A.M. Lesgold and C.A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive Process in Reading (page 37-60). Hilldale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Sousa, D. A. 2004. How the Brain Learns to Read? Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Yang, Yu-Fen. 2006. Reading Strategies or Monitoring Comprehension Strategies. Reading Psychology, (online), 27: 313-343, (www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02702710600846852), retrieved on April 13, 2015.
Zemliansky, P. 2008. Methods of Discovery: A Guide to Research Writing. Boston: Addison-Wesley
Published
2018-09-17
How to Cite
FEMILIA, Praptika Septi. CRITICAL READING STRATEGIES EMPLOYED BY GOOD CRITICAL READERS OF GRADUATE STUDENTS IN ELT, STATE UNIVERSITY OF MALANG. TEFLA Journal (Teaching English as Foreign Language and Applied Linguistic Journal), [S.l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 30-34, sep. 2018. Available at: <http://journal.umbjm.ac.id/index.php/TEFLA/article/view/196>. Date accessed: 21 oct. 2018.
Section
Articles