Online Learning and Face-to-face Learning: Students’ Preferences and Perspectives

  • Nor Hasanah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Abstract

Covid-19 pandemic has shifted face-to-face learning into online learning. This learning system has been conducted for more than a year. Teachers and students have to adapt to this condition. With such experience, students must have their opinions on these two learning modes. This study aims to find out students’ preferences and perspectives toward online learning that has been carried out during the pandemic and face-to-face learning that we used to have. It also tries to investigate whether their perspectives influence their preferences on the learning mode. The data was collected using a survey; it was then analyzed using SPSS Statistics. Pearson Product Moment was used to analyze the correlation between variables, while students’ preferences and perspectives were explained through descriptive statistics. The results showed that 83 percent of students preferred face-to-face learning, students gave more positive responses toward face-to-face learning although they also admitted the advantages offered by online learning. Another finding indicated that flexibility, ease of course, convenience, and time-saving influence students’ preference for online learning, while interaction and learning experience became some reasons for students to choose face-to-face learning. Most of the students had internet access to take online classes. However, they still considered face-to-face learning as an ideal class because 87 percent of students agreed that not all regions in Indonesia had good internet access to conduct online learning. This study was limited in generalizability since it was conducted in one university with only 64 students as participants; it was a small number of populations. However, this research could provide a little description and information related to students’ opinions on online learning. This study still needs to be improved with more participants and conducted in other places and situations.


 


Keywords:  Face-to-face learning, online learning, students’ preferences, and students’ perspectives

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Rashid, S., & Yadav, S. S. (2020). Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Higher Education and Research. Indian Journal of Human Development, 14(2), 340–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973703020946700
[2] Bubb, S., & Jones, M. A. (2020). Learning from the COVID-19 home-schooling experience: Listening to pupils, parents/carers, and teachers. Improving Schools, 23(3), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480220958797
[3] Milthorpe, N., Clarke, R., Fletcher, L., Moore, R., & Stark, H. (2018). Blended English: Technology-enhanced teaching and learning in English literary studies. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 17(3), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022217722140
[4] Running Bear, C., Terrill, W. P. A., Frates, A., Peterson, P., & Ulrich, J. (2021). Challenges for Rural Native American Students with Disabilities During COVID-19. Rural Special Education Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870520982294
[5] Alizadeh, I. (2012). Challenges of employing E-learning for teaching language: A case of teaching English in Iran. E-Learning and Digital Media, 9(4), 426–438. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2012.9.4.426
[6] Kummitha, H. R., Kolloju, N., Chittoor, P., & Madepalli, V. (2021). Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Its Effect on Teaching and Learning Process in the Higher Educational Institutions. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 90–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983650
[7] Moorhouse, B. L., Li, Y., & Walsh, S. (2021). E-Classroom Interactional Competencies: Mediating and Assisting Language Learning During Synchronous Online Lessons. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220985274
[8] Arbaugh, J.B. (2002), “A longitudinal study of technological and pedagogical characteristics of web-based MBA courses”, Academy of Management Proceedings, Denver, CO, August 9-14, pp. A1-A6.
[9] Arbaugh, J.B. and Duray, R. (2002), “Technological and structural characteristics, student learning and satisfaction with web-based courses: an exploratory study of two online MBA programs”, Management Learning, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 331-347.
[10] Haigh, M. (2007), “Divided by a common degree program? Profiling online and face-to-face information science students”, Education for Information, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 93-110.
[11] Hyllegard, D., Heping, D. and Hunter, C. (2008), “Why do students leave online courses? Attrition in community college distance learning courses”, International Journal of Instructional Media, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 429-434.
[12] Guernsey, L. (1998), “Colleges debate the wisdom of having on-campus students enroll in online classes”, Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. A28-A30, March 27.
[13] Young, A. and Norgard, C. (2006), “Assessing the quality of online courses from the students’ perspective”, Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 107-115.
[14] Lauver, K. J., Drum, D. M., Windsor, J. M., & Miller, S. M. (2013). Preference of education mode: Examining the reasons for choosing and perspectives of courses delivered entirely online. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 5(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/17581181311310315
[15] Columbaro, N. (2009), “Employer perceptions of online degrees: a literature review”, Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Vol. XII No. 1, available at www.westga.edu/ Bdistance/ojdla/spring121/columbaro121.html
[16] Robinson, C.C. and Hullinger, H. (2008), “New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning”, Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 84 No. 2, pp. 101-109.
[17] Hass, A., & Joseph, M. (2018). Investigating different options in course delivery – traditional vs online: is there another option? International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(4), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-09-2017-0096
[18] Britt, R. (2006), “Online education: a survey of faculty and students”, Radiologic Technology, Vol. 77 No. 3, pp. 183-190.
[19] Gok, T. (2015), “The evaluations of the college students’ perceptions on distance education from the point of the technical and educational factors”, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 84-93.
[20] Hamied, F.A. (2017). Research methods: A guide for first-time researchers. Bandung: UPI Press
[21] Fortune, M.F., Shifflett, B, & Sibley, R. A. (2006). A comparison of online (high tech) and traditional (high touch) learning in business communication courses in Silicon Valley. Journal of Education for Business, 81(4), 210-214 Mar-Apr 2006.
[22] Directorate General of Higher Education, Ministry of Education and Culture. (2021). Survey Satu Tahun Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Daring.
Published
2022-02-16
How to Cite
HASANAH, Nor. Online Learning and Face-to-face Learning: Students’ Preferences and Perspectives. TEFLA Journal (Teaching English as Foreign Language and Applied Linguistic Journal), [S.l.], v. 3, n. 2, p. 56-68, feb. 2022. ISSN 2654-5152. Available at: <https://journal.umbjm.ac.id/index.php/TEFLA/article/view/872>. Date accessed: 13 oct. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.35747/tefla.v3i2.872.
Section
Articles